GeoEngineeringWatch! | |
---|---|
|
Geoengineer David Keith announced at the AAAS meeting in San Diego, On Saturday, Feb. 20th, that the stratospheric AEROSOL geoengineering program is now considering USING ALUMINUM, over 10 MEGATONS per year, instead of sulfur. (Video) 10-20 megatons of Aluminum a year without any testing of what that will do? Hey David KEITH....Alzheimer’s disease and osteoporosis. Colic, rickets, gastrointestinal problems, interference with the metabolism of calcium, extreme nervousness, anemia, headaches, decreased liver and kidney function, memory loss, speech problems, softening of the bones, and aching muscles can all be caused by aluminum toxicity. This disturbing report dovetails not so nicely with those pointing the scientific finger at increased stratsopheric geoengineering experimentation with aluminum already going on. USDA Scientist challenges David Keith's LACK of understanding of aluminum to be used in geoengineering with his research linking increased aluminum and it's affect on soil PH (killing the forest!) in northern California...after years of aluminum fallout following obvious SRM testing (illegal of course). Here, David Keith tells the US House hearings that rich people could buy an ICE AGE with the stratospheric aerosol program, Here is the entire talk. Keith is partly funded by Bill Gates. Are "scientists" like Keith stealing these citizens ideas (after all their plan NOW is what we have been saying has been an ongiong deployment / experiment), or are unaware of the science behind jet trails that SHOULD NOT remain in the sky and turn into clouds, or are they decieving us about their knowledge of top secret government testing? Keith spoke to activists outside the meeting and said he had been working on the aerosol program for 10 years ALTHOUGH he admitted in the AAAS conference that NO TESTING OR RESEARCH HAS BEEN DONE AS TO THE AFFECTS OF ALUMINUM BEING USED AS AN AEROSOL ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Professor Martin Bunzl Ph.D. is the director of the Rutgers Initiative on Climate Change, Social Policy and Politics. Recently he debated Livermore scientist /geoengineer Ken Caldeira on the BBC. A recent Rutgers report reveals that Caldeira's SRM scheme could leave over TWO BILLION people without food. Caldeira stated that "we" should look into creating institutions and the like to feed them and offer reparations for the damage his experiment will do.
Geoengineers WHO DENY STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL TESTING ISNT ALREADY TAKING PLACE NEED: Explain then these video clips of unmarked military tankers during SPRAY OPERATIONS OVER POPULATED AREAS OF CALIFORNIA. Apparently Europeans alot of Europeans have had enough. Here is a report from a Post Man in the UK. Here is a Stanford link revealing that aersols in the atmosphere slow winds (decreasing wind power etc) and reduce rainfall. TWO OF THE TOP GEOENGINEERING SCIENTISTS First of all, Caldeira and Keith APPEAR TO BE DECEIVING US Would we really re-engineer our atmosphere BEFORE we gave up Coca Cola,Chevron and Monsanto? Would we divert the course of our Children's future towards CERTAIN UNCERTAINTY because the stock market MUST GO ON? Its an excuse...a scapegoat, when these scientists say we should not deploy but do NOT ACT LIKE IT. IF we are in grave danger, one that warrants geoengineering? Why wouldn't they be getting arrested like James Hanson? (NASA, and his stance on the urgency to stop the coal industry) Why would they DEPLOY experimentation (which is DEPLOYMENT) without first MAKING CLEAR to mankind that industry and government are criminal in their inaction to halt greenhouse gas emissions? Historically, James Fleming pointed out, people have been fantasizing about manipulating the atmosphere for decades. They fall into two categories: “commercial charlatans and serious but deluded scientists.” -SmithsonianMag
Geoengineering is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY when it is forced, without consent. It is a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD). Eventually, one would hope these programs and those responsible for them will be met with the awakened awareness of a public potentially caught between Life and Death. When farmers discover they can no longer grow crops because of soil PH, chemical pollution, reduced sunlight and precipitation theft, will there be peace? When parents discover these programs and conclude their child's autism and their parents Alzheimer's (and their own) is fueled by Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering, will they just sit by silently? When the masses discover their respiratory distress is directly a result of aerosol spraying, who will hold back outrage...the US military? Aren't their families breathing the same air? When lives and ecosystems, oceans and forests, are likely destroyed by forced geoengineering, will those responsible escape the multitudes of humanity who have discovered the lethal actions of these scientific and political profiteers?
Its difficult to ever call these men "scientists" when their solutions are economic and not scientific. A common theme in their scheme is that it may cost a hundred times less to pollute the stratosphere then to grow up and become a mature society that respects the planet that provides everything for us. Its easier, CHEAPER, to pollute than to stop fouling the very air that we breath. What is scientific about polluting the atmosphere to cool the planet while destroying it? Nothing. In fact, Caldeira and Keith's aerosol solution is close to IDENTICAL to the conspiracy theories of so called chemtrail activists, and a program that Caldeira says doesn't exist (How scientific are men who cannot correctly identify a condensation trail from a cloud that was created from jet trails ). How convenient it doesn't exist YET he wants to start a program that is almost identical to it. David Keith said outside the AAAS meeting in San Diego that he would be happy to look at citizen tests showing Aluminum, Barium and other elements are showing up in our water, air and soil. Keith also said that children should have a say whether geoengineering should be deployed and that democracy should be used...he suggested a referendum. He went on to say that NOT EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE A SAY and sited that torture and nuclear weapons are examples of things kept secret for "the better good". This statement suggests he supports torture but perhaps he will clarify that. Two sides to his mouth. Everyone, including kids should have a say, AND somethings are better kept secret for the better good....like torture and nuclear weapons. HUH? MORE ON CALDEIRA Caldeira has been (and many believe STILL IS) VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN MILITARY WEAPONS CONCEPTIONS, although his comments below a San Francisco Examiner article, tried to steer the reader from those facts. His comment in the examiner: Caldeira (NOW): I do not have and never have had any relationship, financial or otherwise, with any US government spraying program. Furthermore, I do not believe there is a US government spraying program aimed at climate intervention. (Do you really believe the Bush Administration cared enough about climate change to risk political capital by engaging in secret activities to diminish climate change risk?) We suspect Caldeira may be DEFLECTING his knowledge of what is really going on with HIS answers. NOW, here is his comments just a couple of years ago. Here is the mp3 link to the actual interview, along with other scientists, made by New York Skywatch Journalist Geoff Brady: Caldeira (THEN): I used to work at Lawrence Livermore Lab where we all participated in a meeting. Where we sat around the room thinking of ways to manipulate geophysical systems to use it as a weapon. That means could you somehow interfere with the earth's functioning in a way that you could use it as a military weapon. Could you change climate, what could you do to manipulate the earth's physical system. Some of the ideas were, could we blow up hydrogen bombs underwater or offshore to make a tidal wave that would go over a city. The result was isn't it easier to drop the hydrogen bomb on the city. Now, you could imagine putting pathogens in a cloud. Let the cloud go over somewhere and rain down on your enemy, do chemical or germ warfare. That may work on something as big as the former Soviet Union, where you could be pretty sure that in a few days that cloud would rain out. Notice how he says there is no spray program for climate intervention. IS THIS A PLAY on words? Obviously such a program WOULD BE a capable weapons program, as stated in his own words. He ALREADY ADMITTED to having a connection with a think tank (Lawrence Livermore) for the branch of government that wages war and makes secret weapons. IS HE splitting the truth and forwarding a DECEPTION? Caldeira is a weapons innovator by his own words and was (and many believe still is) PAID TO DO SO BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS. Caldeira MODIFYs his statement YET AGAIN, this according to journalist Eli Kintish (an admitted friend of Caldeira) of ScienceNow, an AAAS owned media journal: “I worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory with Edward Teller and Lowell Wood,” Caldiera said later, citing the father of the H-Bomb and his acolyte. He feared the use of geoengineering as a weapon, not schemed to develop it as one (Kintish's speculation) . “They couldn’t get money for this work—I doubt anyone else can.” On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 (2.3 trillion) in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Ken may have a problem doubting, casting doubt on his abilities. THIS is the man essentially saying "TRUST ME". "...people make judgments based primarily on their values, belief systems, world views, and emotions. Facts play a much more minor role. This gap cannot be bridged by loading the public with facts, or trying to make the public more science literate. How should scientists deal with this awkward reality?" Exploring Caldeira's Livermore employment it is impossible to not be alerted to Lowell Wood and Edward Teller. Woods and Caldeira are consultants to BILL GATES. Caldeira also shares a geoengineering patent with BILL GATES. According to Rolling Stone Magazine, LOWELL WOOD IS THE PENTATON's TOP WEAPONEER.
Lowell Wood is an astrophysicist who worked with Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb. A member of the Director’s Technical Staff at the University of California’s Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Lowell is also a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, and he serves on the board of directors of the Hertz Foundation. According to Wikipedia (Teller) "In his later years he became especially known for his advocacy of controversial technological solutions to both military and civilian problems, including a plan to excavate an artificial harbor in Alaska using thermonuclear explosives." Going further with wikipedia, and connecting ideology and (LOWELL) corruption to current issues: "In the 1980s, Teller began a strong campaign for what was later called the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), derided by critics as "Star Wars," the concept of using ground and satellite-based lasers, particle beams and missiles to destroy incoming Soviet ICBMs. Teller lobbied with government agencies—and got the sanction of President Ronald Reagan—for his plan to develop a system using elaborate satellites which used atomic weapons to fire X-ray lasers at incoming missiles— as part of a broader scientific research program into defenses against nuclear weapons. However, scandal erupted when Teller (and his associate Lowell Wood) were accused of deliberately overselling the program and perhaps had encouraged the dismissal of a laboratory director (Roy Woodruff) who had attempted to correct the error.[38] His claims led to a joke which circulated in the scientific community, that a new unit of unfounded optimism was designated as the teller; one teller was so large that most events had to be measured in nanotellers or picotellers. Many prominent scientists argued that the system was futile. Bethe, along with IBM physicist Richard Garwin and Cornell University colleague Kurt Gottfried, wrote an article in Scientific American which analyzed the system and concluded that any putative enemy could disable such a system by the use of suitable decoys. The project's funding was eventually scaled back." "In the 1970s, a letter of Teller to Leo Szilard emerged, dated July 2, 1945:
"Our only hope is in getting the facts of our results before the people. This might help convince everybody the next war would be fatal. For this purpose, actual combat-use might even be the best thing." MORE Who's Who of Elite
Geo-Engineers (profiteering)
READ WHAT IS ON THEIR WEBSITE ABOUT WHAT THE AssOCIATION of SCIENTISTS THINK ABOUT YOU OTHER GEOENGINEERING MEETINGS/SEMINARS/EVENTS TO WATCH
|
---|