NASA Presentation, Geoengineering And Climate Change
Yet again agencies of the power structure point out the elephant in the room, geoengineering, and then pretend its not really there. In the attached video feed, discussion of geoengineering, solar radiation management (SRM), begins at about 32 minute mark. http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/29293171
U.S. Code › Title 42 › Chapter 85 › Subchapter II › Part B
42 U.S. Code Part B – Aircraft Emission Standards
§ 7571 – Establishment of standards
§ 7572 – Enforcement of standards
§ 7573 – State standards and controls
§ 7574 – Definitions
Complete page: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-85/subchapter-II/part-B
40 CFR – Protection of Environment | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
CHAPTER I – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CHAPTER IV – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CHAPTER V – COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CHAPTER VI – CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD
CHAPTER VII – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR VESSELS OF THE ARMED FORCES
CHAPTER VIII – GULF COAST ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION COUNCIL
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40
15 U.S. Code § 2614 – Prohibited acts | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2614
15 U.S. Code § 2615 – Penalties | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2615
15 U.S. Code § 2605 – Regulation of hazardous chemical substances and mixtures
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2605
Excerpted from: 15 U.S. Code § 2606 – Regulation of hazardous chemical substances and mixtures
(f) “Imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture” defined
"For the purposes of subsection (a) of this section, the term “imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture” means a chemical substance or mixture which presents an imminent and unreasonable risk of serious or widespread injury to health or the environment. Such a risk to health or the environment shall be considered imminent if it is shown that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or disposal of the chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of such activities, is likely to result in such injury to health or the environment before a final rule under section 2605 of this title can protect against such risk."
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2606
15 U.S. Code Chapters 9A – WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS; REPORTING REQUIREMENT
§ 330 – Definitions
§ 330a – Report requirement; form; information; time of submission
§ 330b – Duties of Secretary
§ 330c – Authority of Secretary
§ 330d – Violation; penalty
§ 330e – Authorization of appropriations Complete page: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-9A
In an 1883 issue of Planters Monthly from Hawaii someone wrote,
“Whether it would be wise to introduce the animal to these Islands may be a question. It would be important to first learn more of the nature of the creature, for they may prove an evil.”
The speaker brought this up. I knew about the rats, but I wasn’t aware what damage had been done by the mongoose.
I thought this was an excellent quote to use about geoengineering. There are trees and wildlife dying right before ours eyes right now. I see it with my own eyes everday. It is the biggest threat to nature right now, at least from my perpective.
Did I say spoon-fed?
My family and I have been watching this presentation but find we can only watch it in small bites. Not because it is over our heads, it is just hard to swallow. To be told “We scientists observe nature” and know that it is blatenly clear that the aerosol Geoengineering program is destroying nature right now. If you are observing nature you would see this very clearly.
Haven’t finished watching this through. I wonder how much is being paid for this?
Who is in the audience watching this presentation anyway. I am afraid Homeland Security would be removing me by now and we still have 40 minutes more to watch.:)
I don’t really believe we can’t expose this mongoose. There are just so many rats out there it gets overwhelming.
Will finish watching this evening.
Thanks!
Notice Riley Duren says “BINGO!” when an audience member brings up his cursory reference to
population……what he’s really talking about is UN Agenda 21.
As one who has extensively researched United Nations Agenda 21, the WHY of it, and compiled almost 100 pages of history, cited materials with live links and amassed significant quotes from world leaders, I recognise and share Climate Change pros and cons, however, my studies have complelled me to conclude this Agenda 21 is a much more ominous worldwide plan than merely destroying private land ownership and rewilding the globe.
UN commissioned scientists known as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have declared a global emergency…terminal Climate Change caused by humans. That decision has already been made and the elites are working on implementing the solution. The climate change pitch is via United Nations Agenda 21, whether scientifically sound or not. The real problem has been officially declared as over-population. The vehicle to solve it is Agenda 21.
I have studied Agenda 21. The bottom line is this:
It’s “sustainability” basic theme relies on the CO2 Climate Change argument. It has everything to do with the “accepted” scientific conclusion that overpopulation will kill the Earth by 2050. Even if CO2 emissions fall to zero the plague upon the Earth will remain: us…. you and me.
The UN commissioned Global Biodiversity Assessment Report, page 773, calls for a population reduction to 1 billion people. (An exception is provided: if the world is de-industrialized (meaning pre-1765), a peasant population of 4- 5 billion is to be allowed). http://www.freedomadvocates.org/images/pdf/Unsustainables_UN_Global…
The Report’s bottom line is clearly stated:
“Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere.”
Population will reach 10.8 billion by 2050. 15.8 billion by 2100. To feed it, food production must increase in the next 37 years by upwards of 100%. See:
http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm
http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/WorldPop2300final.pdf
CO2 emissions must drop to zero immediately to keep PPMs below 450 and keep average temperature from increasing by more than 2 degrees Celsius, the allowable ceilings. But in order to feed so many, CO2 would have to drastically rise, not fall. So the only conclusion is we must depopulate now by 5-6 billion and slash CO2 fossil fuel emissions to zero. The iron fist of communism is needed to make it work. We are already essentially there. http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
And that is exactly what is being undertaken, with help from UN Agenda 21 and well known billionaires, who contribute huge sums to a broad array of UN and other population control programs. It’s all there if you do the research, as I have. See UN World Economic and Social Survey 2011 for a very explicit summary of this whole non-fiction agenda: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_archive/2011wess.pdf
So what is really meant by UN Agenda 21 “sustainability” is simply that you and I are not “sustainable”.
I’m so glad I already had a fantastic ride in what used to be America but I fear for my daughter and grandson. As a Bronze Star Medal recipient commissioned officer who fought communism in Vietnam and as a Constitutional attorney for 38 years, it is uniquely disturbing to me to see this Fabian Socialist (Fascist)/Communist program being seamlessly sewn into world, federal, state and local governments and the cultural mindset.
This helps in exposing the cancer. Congratulations and thank you but….
‘the pellets of poison are flooding the waters’. “Hard Rain’s Agonna Fall”, Bob Dylan.
This is not a joke.
Good luck, Comrades…..
We are sooo screwed…
Why do they need to be spoonfed like this?
Very interesting and revealing, thanks!
[…] Keep on reading @ geoengineeringwatch.org […]